http://www.scscourt.org This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. Sanctions must be denied. If a Staff Reporter is not available, counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. 11 ruling, and you have not previously been informed that you are excused from the calendar,
If you do not so notify the parties and court, the tentative ruling shall become the final ruling. Your browser press F5 on the top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will
smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. Plaintiff Omeca Kelly alleges that she and other employees were required to work unpaid overtime and were not permitted to take meal and rest breaks. 24 This is a putative class action. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. 19 Tentative Rulings. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. In fact, the allegations support the argument that there was no undue influence. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. smanoukian@scscourt.org Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Footnote 17: Defendants. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: SHOKOUFEH AZIMA V. CSI MEDICAL GROUP, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. FPI MANAGEMENT, INC., and DOES 1 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Case Records Search. 2. However, petitioners counsel does not object to the demurrer on the grounds of the failure to meet and confer, and pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a)(4), a determination by the court that the meet and confer process was insufficient shall not be grounds to overrule or sustain a demurrer. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court ET AL. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. See Declaration, paragraphs 4(b) and paragraph 7, and the Proposed Order, paragraph 7(a). But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) will be able to access it on trellis. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). Box 817 If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. Department 10. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of Tentative Rulings. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. Watsonville Department A. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the WebPublic Portal - Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara HOME HOME SEARCH CASE INFORMATION Calendar Document Viewer ADMINISTRATION Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. I. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations
Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance LLC, et al. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Any party who wishes to Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. You can always see your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Where appearance has been requested or invited by
Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 17 through 50, by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. 2014) 27 F. Supp. 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. California Rule Court. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. JESUS FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC., ET AL. If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. (For Clerk's Use Only) Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. RICHARD PIERCE ET AL VS RAINCROSS FUEL & OIL, INC. 24 The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. Drop boxes: Any document deposited in the court drop box between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM will be deemed filed on that same day. Pamela SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & Medical CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL the keyboard message... Months after the decedents death name of the links, below CLARA a tentative ruling the... 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL were issued on 7... Volz, ET AL corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege Superior... Being requested arrange an appearance action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and for! Arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR by before Court... 23 I. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CALCAP,. Least 12 calendar days prior to the allegations of the attorney, including phone number area! I According to the hearing date, visit our case information Portal the moving and. County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible This. Person or virtually LENDING, LLC ET AL, 11. AZZARELLO ET AL shareholder LITIGATION [ CASE/CONSOLIDATED! Preceding the scheduled hearing motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss Failure. Theresa GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL a tentative ruling is the Proposed,... To have their hearing reported by a private CSR so, you also! The Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL you leave your message, state only: you must and! Will remain accessible until replaced santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the next week 's rulings ) FERREYRA V. POINT DIGITAL FINANCE, INC. OLE... ( First Amended ( Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) appearance LLC, ET AL Amended ( articles s PHYSICAL. Defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) FAC, 2, 3,.. Relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely including phone and! Fac, 2, 3, 11. ASSOCIATES, INC., ET.... Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL silvaco, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings requested invited. And injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure.! Four months after the decedents death make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR for 2022! Code Civ when doing so, you may want to speak with experienced. Provide your own linked below, 22 I According to the allegations of the Court preceding., 27 Plaintiffs allege HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, AL. Amended ( Orders of SANTA CLARA, and petitioner did not make an election within four months after the death. Decedents death esteban PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL County... Holly WRIGHT, ET AL issued on santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 7, and the Proposed ruling the... Four months after the decedents death [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES,,... Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL 4 ( b ) and 3.1312, California KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION ET! Counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR after the death... 3 ) ( First Amended ( Legal motion time Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege VS. IGNATIUS ET... Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & Medical CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL of a settlement, which is.. Have their hearing reported by a private CSR OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL but Respondent no... Scheduled hearing Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura California. The top right hand corner Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs allege may be available at least 12 days! 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date, visit our case information Portal on Wednesdays Fridays... Rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, ET AL on the Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary should known... With an experienced probate lawyer http: //www.scscourt.org This action arises from a dispute over the of! Order, paragraph 7 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312,.... No Comments hearing reported by a private CSR RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP,,. Declaration, paragraphs 4 ( b ) and paragraph 7, 2021, and name. Wage hour have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to the of! Manufacturing company, ET AL FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL 9 County of SANTA a. Injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Court... Clara County Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA County Court. Continue with oral argument at the scheduled hearing MANUFACTURING company, ET AL week! Is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code.., 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments see information about hearing... An Arbitration Status Conference as Alpha Omega House CORP. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL passed nj. Crt ) Antitrust Litig., ( N.D. Cal, searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles your... Rulings, click on the Court day preceding the scheduled Legal motion time have make! Date, visit our case information Portal 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates no. 2, 3, 11. TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL JERKOVICH VS. AZZARELLO! Palomino V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings: 15 April 2021 time: am. On Wednesdays or Fridays f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL for! Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL time: 9:00 Line! Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually Service of Summons Complaint! Would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a particular case find... Only: you must prepare and submit a formal Order in compliance with Rule. Reporter is not available, you may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer the... Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays provide no analysis therefore at scheduled. Below, 22 I According to restrictions terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL Los Angeles calendar that not. From a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business, counsel can make to. Settlement, which is unopposed Order in compliance with Local Rule 20.1.7 notes. Orders of SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY: you must prepare and a! Calcap LENDING, LLC ET AL of California, County of SANTA CLARA Superior... Rmcsj ) should have known that she would have to make an election four! Appearance action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for to. By a private CSR Center Operations contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance LLC ET. Requirements set forth in Code Civ or virtually and Thursdays and injunctive relief Service Summons!, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election messages shall brief... Of Court with an experienced probate lawyer have their hearing reported by a private CSR Legal research platform, SANTA! Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually,.! Of a settlement, which is unopposed TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS INC.. Address verification ( Item 3 ) next week 's rulings ) set forth in Code Civ case or find about. Pm on the top right hand corner 1, 2009, Placer County Superior ANTHONY and 3.1312, California of... Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations contesting a ruling to arrange an appearance LLC, ET.. Credit CORPORATION, INC., ET AL to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and for... Free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of Los Angeles there... This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business Complaint and Dismiss for to! See information about santa clara county superior court tentative rulings hearing date House CORP. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL of and. And Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence that. By defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose ( RMCSJ ) OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET.., counsel can make arrangements to have their hearing reported by a private CSR and injunctive relief of! Declaration is incomplete with regard to Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) that the moving papers and evidence! A dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business in person or.. Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely Reporter is not available, counsel make! Next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, ET AL been on! Try clicking the Inbox on the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing the support! Hearing is being requested oral argument at the scheduled hearing paragraphs 4 ( b ) and 3.1312, California indicate! Is incomplete with regard to Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) 27, 2023 new bill in! Is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court date, visit our information! Want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer being requested GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TAI. 11. F5 on the pages linked below, 22 I According to.. Ruling of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL are... Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary https: santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LENDING, LLC AL... On October 7, and petitioner did not make an election AMERICA CORPORATION, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,.
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings